Honduras

The Facts

On Sunday 28 June 2009 the President of Honduras Manual Zelaya was deposed by a military coup. He was deported to Costa Rica after being picked up in his office in Tegucigalpa. Having arrived at his destination under military control, he immediately declared on the Telesur TV channel that, despite the official condemnations by Clinton and Obama himself, the American government was behind the coup.

The Formal Causes

The coup came about as a result of two delicate situations. The first was an internal struggle within the Army. Zelaya had relieved the Head of the Army, Romeo Vasquez of his post. His restoration was demanded by the same Supreme Court which was behind the arrest of Zelaya. The second and more important is that the whole affair is based on the attempt by the Honduran President to obtain, through a non-binding referendum, the possibility of a second term of office which is not allowed for in the Constitution.

Iran at the crossroads - workers cannot support any faction of the ruling class

Leaflet for a demo in Sheffield, UK

Iranian ruling class splits

On the one side — those sectors which more or less look to the family of the Ayatollah Rafsanjani (one of the richest and most powerful in the country), who are tired of the limitations on economic activity imposed by international sanctions and want a greater opening towards outsiders. On the other side, those sectors of the bourgeoisie whose power has been strengthened in the last few years,favourable to the aggressive policy of Ahmadinejad.

The 10th Iranian Presidential Elections 2009

The following text was written a few days ago by an Iranian comrade of the IBRP to explain the origins of the current crisis, A further text is planned to explain the predicament of the working class in Iran today which will also include some indications on the way forward for workers in this crisis.

Following a few heated television debates involving the 4 candidates, millions of Iranians cast their votes in an exceptionally hyped up and engineered election on 14th June 2009. This was the 10th presidential election since the Iranian 1979 revolution. From the early hours of Friday, long queues formed and people participated in an unprecedented scale. All four candidates were endorsed by the Guardian Council a watchdog which bans un-Islamic candidates.

Neither Ahmadinejad nor Moussavi - Long Live Class Struggle!

We received the following document from a courageous Iranian internationalist. As far as we understand he has sent it to a number of internationalist left communist organisations and his position is one we would fully endorse (even if we would have liked more on the concrete organisational issues such as existing class organisations and the need for an independent political organisation of the working class). Hopefully these will be forthcoming in future documents. We have taken the liberty of correcting the English without in the slightest altering the intentions of the author. IBRP 20 June 2009

After the election circus, Ahmadinejad was presented as winner and this resulted in the political confrontation and crisis between bourgeois gangs. The leader of one faction, Moussavi would not accept the result and mobilized protestors throughout the entire country which resulted in some demonstrators getting wounded or killed.

Iran at the Crossroads

http://www.ibrp.org/files/images/2009-06-18-iran-protest-01.thumbnail.jpg

Bourgeois rivalries and the recomposition of imperialist alliances behind the Iranian crisis

As we write demonstrations are taking place in Tehran and other Iranian cities which are being brutally attacked by the police, flanked by paramilitaries (from the Basiji; A type of militia incorporated into the Pasdaran or Revolutionary Guards) so it is as yet difficult to see how events will unfold. What is certain is that beyond the slogans, and the subjective intentions of the mass of people who have taken to the streets, what is taking place is a bitter confrontation between opposing factions of the Iranian bourgeoisie, each lined up behind one of the presidential candidates, the two principal challengers for the presidency being Moussavi and Ahmedinejad, the latter already loudly proclaimed President.

Darwin and the Scientific Understanding of Humanity - A Revolution in Science

http://www.ibrp.org/files/images/2009-04-15-darwin-monkey.thumbnail.jpg

With the publication of the Origin of the Species 150 years ago, Darwin described what happened in the hundreds of millions of years given to the Earth’s age by geologists such as Charles Lyell. Without this enormous timespan (which, in fact, grossly underestimates the current view that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old), natural selection would not have had time to work on the variations produced in the reproduction and produce the immense range of animal species present today. The work of Lyell and others in overthrowing the 6000 year age favoured by Christians working from the Bible chronology laid the basis for Darwin’s overthrow of the entire biblical creation story.

In fact Darwin’s [1] bombshell not only undermined the mythology of Christianity but of Judaism and Islam as well.

The Clash for Gas - Europeans Shivered while Ukraine and Russia Haggled

http://www.ibrp.org/files/images/2009-04-15-russian-gas.thumbnail.jpg

If any more proof were needed that capitalism is a less than useful way to provide for social needs the latest clash between Russia and Ukraine over payment for gas was it.

In a repeat of the gas war between the two states in the winter of 2006 Russia’s Gazprom, the world’s largest gas company, cut supplies to Ukraine on 1st January whilst disingenuously maintaining that exports to the rest of Europe via pipelines in Ukraine would not be affected. While the EU as a whole relies on Russia for around 25% of its natural gas consumption, 80% of it coming through Ukraine, some member states such as Finland or former ‘soviet republics’ like Estonia and Latvia and ex-eastern bloc countries like Bulgaria are more or less a 100% dependent on Russian gas supplies. This did not prevent the dispute escalating.

The End of the Paper Economy and Some Possible Consequences

Introduction

The economic pundits are no longer talking about whether the financial crisis will affect the “real economy”. With world trade falling and unemployment rising reality has already answered that. So The Independent ran an article by an HSBC boss entitled, “Marx was Right” whilst The Financial Times has now started a series on “The Future of Capitalism”. The question being asked today is how capitalism can survive the deepest crisis it has faced since the inter-war years. Even so, there is a yawning gap between the severity of the crisis and the capitalists’ ability to respond. The article here, translated from the December edition of Prometeo, the theoretical review of our sister organisation in Italy, points to the absurdity of trying to solve a systemic crisis on the basis of a banker’s view of the world which sees money as the creator of wealth. This illusion is what fuelled the ballooning of fictitious capital in the first place.

Thirty Years of Islamic Iran - A Warning from History

The Strikes Against the Shah

It is now thirty years since the triumph of Khomeini’s so-called “Islamic Revolution” in Iran. We say so-called because for us the replacement of one brutal regime (that of the Shah) by another (that of the mullahs) doesn’t constitute a real revolution. If revolution means anything for Marxists it means a genuine political transformation which transfers power from one social class to another. This can only come about through the establishment and consolidation of a new mode of production. Iran, like the rest of the world was a capitalist country in 1979. It had a growing working class which was proportionally greater than the working class in Russia in 1917. And it was Iranian workers, headed by the oil workers who began the strike wave of 1977-8, who finished off the Shah. In the course of these strikes the workers set up strike committees which in the wake of the fall of the Shah were often transformed into “shuras”, or councils.

The Imperialist Massacre in Gaza

Pho­­s­pho­­rus­ hitting­ a Unite­d Natio­­ns­ s­c­ho­­o­­l in G­aza
Pho­­s­pho­­rus­ hitting­ a Unite­d Natio­­ns­ s­c­ho­­o­­l in G­aza

The recent so-called “war” in Gaza was not really a war in the general sense of the term. Since it was unleashed by an occupying power on a largely defenceless civilian population in occupied territory it was historically comparable to the campaigns of collective punishment carried out by other occupying powers, particularly those of the Nazis in France or Poland during the Second World War. It would be more accurate to term it a massacre, accompanied by a campaign of destruction of the civilian infrastructure carried out as a collective punishment. The cause of this punishment is the support given by the masses of Gaza to HAMAS [1]. It appears that the Israeli running class imagined that bloodletting and destruction on this scale would erode support for HAMAS and bring about a more pliable ruling group.

The List that Did Exist

As the famous saying goes

Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.

Despite a mountain of anecdotal evidence, and decades of Government and industry denial, earlier this year it was officially confirmed what many workers (especially in the building trade) have known for years: blacklists do exist. Hard evidence came to light when the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) raided an office in Worcestershire and discovered that most of the major construction companies had been paying for information on over 3,200 workers. Some information was over 30 years old. Comments on the workers included

ex-shop steward, definite problems. No go

and

Lazy and a trouble-stirrer

The office was run by a shadowy private detective, Ian Kerr. Kerr had links to the Economic League, an organisation set up in 1919 by industrialists anxious to target militant workers following the Russian Revolution.

Unite - or Divide? The Aftermath of the Lindsey Oil Refinery Strike

Nationalism and the Unions

In the aftermath of the Lindsey oil refinery strike, the Unite General Secretary (for the ex-Amicus bit), Derek Simpson was pictured (between two models) on the front page of the reactionary Daily Star holding a Union Jack with the “British Jobs for British Workers” on it. The Daily Star later ran an article claiming that they had won the strike with their support for “Britons First”. All this is a pack of promotional lies. It was the solidarity and self-activity of the rank and file workers that won the struggle. And the truth of the matter is that the vast majority of the workers who took part in the strike rejected the nationalist agenda which the press and the unions tried to impose on it. As the strike ended, the strike committee finished with the call “Workers of the World Unite”, and was greeted with cheers by the workforce.

However, the battle here is not over.

Time to Turn "the Spectre" into Reality

http://www.ibrp.org/files/images/2008-02-28-capitalism-chains.thumbnail.jpg

A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of Communism …

The Communist Manifesto, 1848

With even The Daily Telegraph titillating its conservative readers with the prospects of “rage on the streets” this summer, there have been a plethora of journalistic warnings that financial meltdown will be followed by social meltdown. The latest prophet of the end of the profits system is Stephen King, boss of HSBC, one of the few banks not beholden to government bailout, despite its record losses, but which has just asked its shareholders for £12.5 billions to bolster its balance sheet. In an article entitled “As capitalism stares into the abyss, was Marx right all along?”, he admires this in The Communist Manifesto

“…the commercial crises… by their periodical return, put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly.

Capitalism Has No Future

http://www.ibrp.org/files/images/2009-03-24-march.thumbnail.jpg

Time for us to Stop Making Sacrifices — Let’s Organise and Fight for a Better World!

May Day 2009 Statement of the IBRP

It’s Their Crisis

This First of May comes at a time of dramatic crisis for the world working class. In just three months fifty million people worldwide have lost their jobs. In the USA 32.2 million people, or more than ten per cent of the population, are now receiving food stamps (worth $83 or £56 per month). This is not just a crisis about deregulated capitalism but the deepest capitalist crisis since the Second World War. Having exploded in the financial sphere, the knock-on effects for the real economy — which is in fact where the crisis was born — are overwhelming.

China 1925-1927

March of communists in Shanghai - 1927
March of communists in Shanghai — 1927

This article is translated from Prometeo 16 — VI series — December 2007

For Trotsky the Chinese revolution of 1925-27 was the most grandiose event after October. It should therefore cast light on aspects which bear on the contemporary situation, given that it anticipated the Spanish experience by 10 years — without the lessons provided by the Chinese proletariat being learnt — and that for many revolutionaries of today, China has begun to “exist” in capitalist terms for, at most, the last 30 years.

1911: the ancient political edifice represented by the semi-god emperor of the Manchu dynasty collapses, after several decades of capitalist penetration by major powers, which had undermined the feudal economic basis thanks to the system of Extra-Territorial Concessions.

Syndicate content