Education
Submitted by stevein7 on Fri, 2008-02-29 15:53
Labour damaged education — study
New Labour’s centralised control of schools has damaged primary education, according to research from the biggest inquiry of its kind for 40 years.
Government influence in the classroom has increased significantly since 1997 with the development of a “state theory of learning”, academics found.
Children spend too much of their time preparing for “batteries of tests” in English and maths at the expense of a broader education in other important subjects, the research warned.
The result is that educational standards may actually have fallen in recent years.
The reports formed part of the Cambridge University-based Primary Review, a major ongoing inquiry into primary education in England.
One study, by Dominic Wyse, from Cambridge University, and Elaine McCreery and Harry Torrance at Manchester Metropolitan University, said: “Government control of the curriculum and its assessment strongly increased during the period from 1988 to 2007, especially after 1997.
“The evidence on the impact of the various initiatives on standards of pupil attainment is at best equivocal and at worst negative.
“While test scores have risen since the mid 1990s, this has been achieved at the expense of children’s entitlement to a broad and balanced curriculum and by the diversion of considerable teaching time to test preparation.”
There have been “some” improvements in standards achieved by many pupils in primary schools.
But the report also found “a decrease in the overall quality of primary education experienced by pupils because of the narrowing of the curriculum and the intensity of test preparation”.
http://news.aol.co.uk/labour-damaged-education-study/article/20080228233309990005
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version

Comments
Why didn't we think of this
Its all going to be sorted out…
Schoolchildren should swear oaths of allegiance in a bid to tackle a “diminution in national pride”, former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith has said.
The peer insisted such measures were needed because Britain had become a more “divided country” with less sense of “belonging” over recent years. Not enough was currently being done in schools to encourage young people to take a constructive role in society, he said.
The recommendation for expanding citizenship ceremonies features in a wide-ranging review carried out by Lord Goldsmith for Prime Minister Gordon Brown. “I have looked with the aid of research at what the situation is,” Lord Goldsmith told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
“Certainly there is not a crisis of national identity — I’m sure we would all see it if there were. But certainly the research does tend to show that there has been a diminution in national pride in the sense of belonging and it is a particularly generational thing. The citizenship ceremonies, which is one of the many things that I have suggested, are a way of marking that passage from being a student of citizenship to being a citizen in practice.”
Lord Goldsmith said the UK had always “done well” out of immigration, but that and other factors were affecting the fabric of society. “We are a more individualist society — in some respects, we are a more divided country,” he said. “Increased mobility within the country, as well as between countries, tends to that sense as well.”
He continued: “It’s something that has happened, you can’t turn the clock back. But I do think it makes sense to look at ways to promote a sense of shared belonging, that you are part of a community with a common venture, to integrate better new members to our society.”
Lord Goldsmith said the ceremonies need not necessarily involve an oath of allegiance to the Queen, which could prove a sticking point for republicans. “It can be a pledge of commitment to the country, it can be a statement of what the rights and responsibilities of citizens are,” he added.
Lord Goldsmith’s report is expected to suggest that the content of citizenship ceremonies — which are currently attended by foreigners taking British nationality — should be “re-energised”.
The study is also likely to clarify the legal rights and responsibilities associated with citizenship, and call for a major overhaul of “archaic” treason legislation. Laws such as sleeping with the wife of the heir to the throne, which carries life imprisonment, would be scrapped or reformed because they are regarded as outdated.
Lord Goldsmith has also hinted at updating the National Anthem by removing verses which are rarely performed.
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
1984...
Teacher fears over classroom CCTV
Teachers expressing concern as more classrooms fitted with CCTV cameras
Teachers warned of an “Orwellian” surveillance culture developing in schools as more classrooms are fitted with CCTV cameras to monitor pupils’ behaviour.
The Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) voiced concern over how increased monitoring of lessons and pressure to get better exam results risks undermining the quality of education.
New school buildings are being fitted with cameras to make sure children can be caught if they misbehave, according to Julia Neal, president of the ATL.
Ms Neal, a history teacher from Torquay Girls’ Grammar School in Devon, warned that the cameras could be used to keep an eye on teachers in future as well.
“They (cameras) are probably put in to monitor behaviour,” she said, speaking at the ATL annual conference in Torquay.
“But because they are there they can then be used in other ways as well.”
She predicted that by 2013, the Government’s focus on test results and school league tables — combined with increased observation of lessons — could have “led to a world with Orwellian overtones”.
“It might be a far-fetched notion that Big Brother will be watching over schools in the next five years, but you only have to listen to what ATL delegates talk about this week to see the current reality of an over-measured, over-monitored education system,” she said.
“Teachers will talk about surveillance cameras in classrooms, about over-zealous observation of their teaching.
“We will hear about teachers delivering a prescriptive curriculum and teaching to the tests in order to secure a good place in the league tables for their school. These issues all add up to an education system which focuses on targets and outcomes, and fails to meet individual pupils’ needs despite the Government’s pledge for personalisation,” she said.
http://news.aol.co.uk/teacher-fears-over-classroom-cctv/article/20080318031609990001
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
teachers to strike?
Teachers have threatened Gordon Brown with a rolling campaign of industrial action over pay and excessive class sizes.
The National Union of Teachers (NUT) will prepare for a ballot of members on a series of possible strikes in England and Wales.
Delegates at the NUT’s annual conference in Manchester condemned the Prime Minster’s approach to limiting public sector workers’ pay.
Ian Murch, from the NUT’s ruling executive, told the conference: “If I were you Mr Brown I would be doing my sums again. You wouldn’t like us when we are angry — and we are getting a bit angry now.”
Mr Murch told Schools Secretary Ed Balls, the Prime Minister’s closest Cabinet ally, to prepare for a fight. “If I were you Mr Balls, I would put my tin hat on right now.”
The union is already balloting members on a one-day strike over pay, provisionally scheduled for April 24.
The motion delegates passed authorises a ballot “at the earliest opportunity” after next month’s planned strike for further industrial action.
Ministers have announced a 2.45% rise for teachers in England and Wales this year, with further rises of 2.3% in 2009 and 2010.
The NUT claims the offer represents a real-terms pay cut as it is below the rate of inflation.
NUT president Bill Greenshields said: “Teachers’ pay is not something separate from the fight for education. Only with decent pay will we attract the best to be teachers. We don’t do the job for money, but we can’t do it without.”
http://news.aol.co.uk/strike-threat-teachers-plan-vote/article/20080322114509990003
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
army in schools
“Teachers to oppose MoD ‘propaganda’
Army recruitment has been discussed at the NUT conference
Teachers have vowed to stop military recruitment campaigns in schools that promote pro-war “propaganda” to teenagers.
The National Union of Teachers (NUT) voted to back staff who resist Armed Forces recruitment drives and called for “education for peace” to be embedded in the school curriculum.
Delegates at the NUT’s annual conference in Manchester called for a campaign to undermine efforts to enlist new teenage recruits in an attempt to hasten the return of British troops from Iraq.
The union backed a motion committing the NUT to “support teachers and schools in opposing Ministry of Defence recruitment activities that are based upon misleading propaganda”.
Paul McGarr, a delegate from east London, told the conference: “Personally, I find it difficult to imagine any recruitment material that is not misleading. We would have material from the MoD saying ‘Join the Army and we will send you to carry out the imperialist occupation of other people’s countries.
“‘Join the Army and we will send you to bomb, shoot and possibly torture fellow human beings in other countries. ‘Join the Army and be sent — probably poorly equipped — into situations where people try and shoot you and kill you because you are occupying their countries.’
“When I see the MoD putting out recruitment material saying that, then maybe I won’t have a problem with using it in school. Until then, I think that all recruitment material is misleading and should be opposed.”
The motion committed the NUT to holding a summit of teachers, education experts and campaigners to consider the issue of military recruitment in schools. The NUT will now campaign for pupils to hear from speakers “promoting alternative points of view” and to have “education for peace embedded in the curriculum along with education about the military”.
The Ministry of Defence hit back at the NUT, denying that it actively recruited pupils in schools. Brigadier Andrew Jackson, Commander of the Army Recruiting Group, said: “The single-Service schools teams visit about 1,000 schools a year, only at the invitation of the school. Their aim is to raise the general awareness of the Armed Forces in society, not to recruit.
“We are proud of the work we do with schools and colleges to inform young people about the tremendous work and careers on offer, which can provide fantastic and unique opportunities to a wide range of people from all sectors of society.”
http://news.aol.co.uk/teachers-to-oppose-mod-propaganda/article/20080324231709990004
Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
inferior class....
Working class ‘has lower IQ’
The working classes have lower IQs than those from wealthier backgrounds and should not be expected to win places at top universities, an academic has claimed.
Bruce Charlton, reader in evolutionary psychiatry at Newcastle University, suggested that the low numbers of working-class students at elite universities was the “natural outcome” of IQ differences between classes.
In a paper shown to the Times Higher Education magazine, Dr Charlton questioned the Government’s drive to get more students from poor backgrounds into top universities like Oxford and Cambridge.
He said: “The UK Government has spent a great deal of time and effort in asserting that universities, especially Oxford and Cambridge, are unfairly excluding people from low social class backgrounds and privileging those from higher social classes.
“Yet in all this debate a simple and vital fact has been missed: higher social classes have a significantly higher average IQ than lower social classes.”
The fact that so few students from poor families get into Oxbridge is not down to “prejudice” but “meritocracy”, he said.
The Government criticised Dr Charlton’s comments. Higher education minister Bill Rammell said: “These arguments have a definite tone of ‘people should know their place’.
“There are young people with talent, ability and the potential to benefit from higher education who do not currently do so. That should concern us all.”
Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said: “It should come as little surprise that people who enjoy a more privileged upbringing have a better start in life.
“It is up to all of us to ensure that not having access to the social and educational benefits that money provides is not a barrier to achieving one’s full potential.”
http://news.aol.co.uk/working-class-has-lower-iq/article/20080521233209990001
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
failing schools
Failing schools should take a “zero tolerance” approach to unruly pupils and set “non-negotiable” standards of behaviour for staff, inspectors have suggested.
A report found that schools in “special measures” — Ofsted’s worst category — improved dramatically when new headteachers were brought in to lay down the law.
A traditional uniform and public school-style house system can also help change the “climate of failure”.
The Ofsted study followed the announcement of a new Government drive to raise standards in the fifth of England’s secondary schools where teenagers struggle to get good GCSEs.
The Ofsted report identified the factors that led schools in special measures to make “dramatic” improvements so that some were later rated “outstanding”.
“The schools needed to overcome a climate of failure and low expectations,” it said.
“Improvement was based on a set of clearly understood values usually identified by the headteacher. Values were communicated clearly to staff, pupils and students by actions and words.
“In the early weeks following special measures the highly visible presence of senior leaders in corridors and in classrooms was seen as important. This was especially so in the schools in which behaviour had been judged unsatisfactory or poor.”
Inspectors said it was also crucial for schools to make sure pupils were more involved in their own education with traditional house systems working well. In one primary school visited for the study, a new uniform and “radically improved decor” were “small but significant changes”.
Earlier this week, ministers warned 638 secondary schools in England that they face closure if they do not improve their results. In all these schools, more than 70% of pupils fail to score five C grades in GCSE subjects including maths and English.
http://news.aol.co.uk/call-to-schools-on-unruly-pupils/article/20080612213709990002
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
A good education....
WOULDN’T YOU FIND it a bit fucking odd if you were told 19 British Prime Ministers went to the same school? Well… they did… they all went to Eton the poshest public school in the country. It would have been 20 but Tony Blair went to Fettes public school – described as ‘the Eton of the North’. But don’t worry…there’ll be another one along in a
minute.
David Cameron went to Eton… then the well trod path to Oxbridge and government. 15 of his Tory front benchers also went to Eton including chums George Osborne and Boris Johnson… then on to Oxbridge. But apparently talk of an upper class elite running the
country is out of date! Under the last five years of New Labour Old Etonians
using the old school tie to get into Oxford has increased by 70%!!
Recent surveys have shown that the privately educated dominate practically every aspect of our
lives… government, civil service, education, television, newspapers, culture, finance, public services, private companies, corporations… even fucking comedy.
Listen to Daniel Wright director of ‘Hot Fuzz’ talking about his days as a ‘Bluecoat Boy’… or Tory Toffs like Guy Ritchie passing himself off as a “well’ard” type geezer… or David Baddiel and the rest of the class tourists eulogising over football like no one had heard
about it before they got their class credentials by association.
There is no aspect of our lives they have not colonised from where we live to what we fucking eat. Even the alleged opposition to the government in the anti-war movement is led by Oxbridge toffs like Tony Benn, Tariq Ali and Ken Loach
The Class war is ongoing and we’re fucking losing it. When Douglas Hurd lost the Tory party leadership to John Major he blamed his Old Etonian past saying the days were gone when an Old Etonian could be Prime Minister in a modern democracy. How wrong he was! The class divide is as strong as ever despite David Cameron’s attempts to pass himself off as an ordinary
decent bloke.
From class war No. 92
“Red red wine, stay close to me now. All i can do i’ve done, but memories won’t go, no memories won’t go.”
It was foreseen
Cleishbotham
IBRP
Stevein
Your latest gleanings on the consequnces of 20 years of the National Curriculum (I think it started with the 1988 Education Act) have not come out of an empty sky for those involved in the system. It was alos all predicted by mnay (incluinding ourselves). I taught in a school on a six mointh contract where I was obliged to tst hem every 6 weeks and fill in optical readers as to which level the students were supposed to be on the attainment targets. After about three months I noticed that my rsults ewre lwoer than e eryone elses so I asked a colleague wherre I was going wrong. He said that I should give the text the week before as a trail run and then give the identical test again the week after. So in each 6 week period the kids actually were learning for 4. Adn this was in a school where 60% of the pupilsa chieved 5 grade Cs or more at GCSE. And now they tell us how sterile the whole thing is…
tory hypocrites defend poor students...
Conservatives have branded the educational inequality gap in English schools “a national disgrace” after figures showed that almost half of children from deprived backgrounds fail to get a single good GCSE.
Some 45% of children eligible for free school meals failed to get a GCSE at grade C or better in 2006/07, compared to 24% of pupils generally, according to official statistics released by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in response to Tory questions.
Only one in 16 of the 80,000 children receiving free school meals stayed on in education after the age of 16 in 2006/07 — a total of just over 5,000 young people.
And just 176 young people from deprived backgrounds — about 0.2% of the total in that age group — gained the three As at A-level which are needed to get into the top universities.
Children on free school meals were 193 times more likely to leave school without a GCSE at a good grade than to stay on and gain three As at A-level.
Shadow children’s secretary Michael Gove said: “For all Gordon Brown’s talk of creating a fair society with opportunity for all, the reality is very different.
“A child from a deprived background is 193 times more likely to leave school without a single good GCSE than they are to get three As at A-level.
“This level of inequality is a national disgrace and a block on opportunity. Reforming our schools and strengthening our families is the key to building a better, happier and fairer society.”
Mr Gove was speaking ahead of a speech he is due to give on Monday about strengthening the family.
http://news.aol.co.uk/tories-claim-student-inequality-gap/article/20080802215331103520040